Multi-Channel TV Cable Co. v. Charlottesville Quality Cable Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
65 F.3d 1113 · 1995
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Mm Dm Em v. School District of Greenville County Mm Dm Em (2002), United States v. Khan (2006)
8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 47 U.S.C. § 224
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Given the conflicting nature of the evidence in the record, we cannot reverse the district court's finding as clearly erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.