Glass v. Vaughn’s Empirical Analysis
65 F.3d 13 · 1995
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2021
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Murray v. Carrier · Schlup v. Delo · Kuhlmann v. Wilson · Glass v. Vaughn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Glass filed various direct appeals and habeas proceedings, including this petition alleging that Attorney Denker was ineffective because he faded to investigate and pursue a diminished capacity defense. Glass presented and lost on this allegation of error before the state trial court in his second postconviction relief petition. Unfortunately, he did not appeal. Thus, the district court held that petitioner’s federal habeas claim was both exhausted and procedurally defaulted. Without the “actual innocence” exception, the court noted that his habeas claim would accordingly be barred. 860 F.Supp. at 215 . We agree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“there is evidence that defendant committed the crime but argues that he or she was responsible for a lesser degree of guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sweger v. Chesney“conclude that no rational juror would have voted to convict [petitioner] of first-degree murder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sweger v. Chesney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.