Ballard v. Savage’s Empirical Analysis
65 F.3d 1495 · 1995
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 39 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 162 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Lee v. City of Los Angeles (2001), 14 Cal. 4th 434 - Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc. (1996)
28 federal appellate · 39 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Hanson v. Denckla · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty. · Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute · Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 162 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[have] taken deliberate action[s] within the forum state,”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) Did the defendant do some act “by which he purposefully avails himself of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum, thereby invoking the benefits and protections of its laws?” (2) Did the claim “arise out of the defendant’s forum-related activities?” (3) Is the exercise of jurisdiction on the facts of the case reasonable?”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An exercise of specific jurisdiction is appropriate only if the nonresident defendant has 'purposefully avail[ed] itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.