United States v. Hooks’s Empirical Analysis
65 F.3d 850 · 1995
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably United States v. Ivy (1996), United States v. Owens (1995)
30 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Estrella v. Brown · United States v. McIntyre · United States v. McAlpine · United States v. Bernaugh · United States v. Richards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the district court's factual findings regarding the quantity of drugs for which a defendant is held responsible for clear error.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“unless: (1) the defendant was sentenced to the requisite term of probation or imprisonment, or (2) the prior offense was similar to an instant offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In essence, Defendant requests we reverse the district court because [the witness] was not a believable witness. This we will not do.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.