Glock v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis
65 F.3d 878 · 1995
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2019 · most notably Lambrix v. Singletary (1997), Dyer v. Calderon (1998)
20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Bruton v. United States · Coleman v. Thompson · Teague v. Lane · Furman v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“courts of appeals do not ‘dictate’ a particular rule to state courts,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“With two narrow exceptions, new rules of constitutional law do not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review. Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302, 314 , 109 S.Ct. 2934, 2944 , 106 L.Ed.2d 256 (1989); Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 301 , 109 S.Ct. 1060, 1070 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989) (plurality opinion). Determining whether a rule is “new” entails a three-step process. Caspari v. Bohlen, 510 U.S. 383 , 114 S.Ct. 948 , 127 L.Ed.2d 236 (1994). First, the court determines when the petitioner’s conviction and sentence became final. Second, the court determines whether the rule the petitioner relies Upon was dictated by precedent existing at the time the conviction became final. Finally, if the court concludes the rule is new, the court considers whether the rule falls within either exception to Teague's bar; Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“survey the legal landscape as it then existed and determine whether a state court considering the defendant's claim at the time his conviction became final would have felt compelled by existing precedent to conclude that the rule he seeks was required by the Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.