Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

65 F.3d 900

Docket No. 93-9270.

United States v. Shields

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Sept. 13, 1995.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-09-13

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Shields

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-09-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2014

11 federal appellate ·

110199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Bruce S. Harvey, Atlanta, GA, for appellant.

¶2Joe D. Whitley, U.S. Atty., NGA, James R. Harper, Amy Levin Weil, Asst. U.S. Attys., Atlanta, GA, for appellee.

¶3ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

¶4(Opinion April 10, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995, 49 F.3d 707)

¶5Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

¶6BY THE COURT:

¶7A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶8IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

/65/f3d/900 · .json · Public domain