¶1 Keith S. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Davis v. Stout, No. CA-03-259-2 (E.D. Va. April 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately *917 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.