Bowles v. Senderowitz’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2005
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)
Relies on Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc. · General American Tank Car Corporation v. El Dorado Terminal Co · United States Upon the Relation and for the Use and Benefit of Texas Portland Cement Company v. D C McCord · City of Texarkana v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. · Berssenbrugge v. Luce Mfg. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following Section 723c, permits a party to set forth transactions or events which happened after the filing of the complaint, the supplemental pleading is merely a continuation of the complaint justifying other or further relief.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.