Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 Haw. 156 - State v. Faatea

State v. Faatea’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
9
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2005 · most notably 2 Va. App. 590 - Jordan v. Commonwealth (1986), People v. Borghesi (2003)

28 state decisions

160198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Charles L. Canty, United States of America v. Charles M. Richardson · Williams v. State · State v. Potter · Rogers v. State · State v. Brighter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[IJnasmuch as there was but one act of theft here, from one owner, we are constrained to hold that the defendant could be convicted and sentenced for but one robbery offense. The theft was of Ramada Inn property, and each of the five employees named were simply custodians of the property for the benefit of their employer. The threatened use of force was directed against all five for the purpose of effectuating the unlawful taking of their employer’s property. It was this threat which converted the taking from theft to robbery. Thus, there was only one aggravated theft (robbery) for which a sentence could be imposed.” 65 Hawaii at 157 , 648 P.2d at 198 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.