Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 KAN 1 - Denton v. Fyfe

Denton v. Fyfe’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
February 1924
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1924

10 state decisions

50190219101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weston v. . Stoddard · Scarborough v. Smith · Estes v. Nell · Peterson v. Fowler · Adam v. Ames Iron Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under our code, however, the fact that the property is held adversely to the plaintiff will not defeat an action of partition when brought in connection with or as part of another action for the recovery of real property. Under our rules of pleading the two causes of action may be united in one action, or they may, when so pleaded, and no objection is made, be tried as' a single cause of action.” (See, also, Scarborough v. Smith, 18 Kan. 399 ; Kennedy v. Haskell, 67 id. 612, 73 Pac. 913 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.