Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 KAN 484 - Ewing v. Mallison

Ewing v. Mallison’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
6
states following
May 1969
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently May 1969 · most notably State Ex Rel. Everette v. Petteway (1938), Hathaway v. Hoffman (1915)

2 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

1501902191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Taylor v. Taintor · Railway Company v. Ramsey · Erwin v. Lowry · Beckett v. Selover · Mastin v. Gray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a principle of universal application, essential to the orderly administration of justice, in order to avoid conflict between tribunals of coequal authority, that the court first acquiring jurisdiction shall be allowed to pursue it to the end, to the exclusion of others; and that it will not permit its jurisdiction to be impaired or subverted by a resort to some other tribunal.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““That upon the decease of any inhabitant of this state, letters testamentary or letters of administration on his estate shall be granted by the probate court of the county in which the deceased was an inhabitant or résident at the time of his death.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.