Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

65 Kan. 849

State v. Cohen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1902

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1902-11-08

<p>Intoxicating Liquors — Salesman for a Wholesale Liquor House. It transpired in the course'of business conducted by a traveling salesman for a wholesale liquor house located-in Missouri that persons ordering would fail to pay the purchase-price and receive the goods ordered, in which event the liquors would remain stored at the depot where received until another order, corresponding in amount and character of goods shipped, could be obtained by the salesman, when he would procure another bill of lading from the house and the liquors so stored would be turned over to such person, upon payment of the purchase-price. Held, that the transaction was in violation of law.</p>

Affirmed · Decided 1902-11-08

Per Curiam;

¶1Defendant, an employe of a wholesale liquor house, located at St. Joseph, Mo., was engaged in soliciting orders for intoxicating liquors in this state. When such orders were received by defendant they would be forwarded to the house at St. Joseph. If approved by the house, the liquors would be shipped to the person ordering. It transpired, in the course of business so conducted, that persons ordering would fail to pay the purchase-price and receive the goods ordered, in which event the liquors would remain stored at the depot where received until another order, corresponding in amount and character of goods shipped, could be obtained by defendant, when he would procure another bill of lading from his house and the liquor so stored would be turned over to such person upon payment of the purchase-price, together with the charges thereon. One of such transactions was had with the prosecuting witness in this case, John Younger, for which defendant was prosecuted, convicted, and appeals.

¶2Whatever may be the right of the defendant under lhe law as a traveling salesman engaged in soliciting orders for his house^located in a foreign state, where such orders are received, accepted and filled in such *851state, and the liquors ordered are delivered to a common carrier for transportation into, and delivery to, the purchaser in this state, the transaction here shown cannot be justified in law. It constituted an unlawful sale and violation of the law.

¶3There being no error apparent in the record, the judgment of conviction is confirmed.

All the Justices concurring.
/65/kan/849 · .json · Public domain