Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 ME 70 - Phillips v. Moses

Phillips v. Moses’s Empirical Analysis

1876

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
June 1951
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1951

4 state decisions

30187618801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is clear, therefore, that he cannot make such payments in any manner available as an offset against a demand for goods lawfully sold; nor when once appropriated with his consent to such illegal items, can he withdraw that consent against the will of his creditor, and claim to have them reckoned as payment for legal purchases."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * even though he sees fit to appropriate it to a claim arising in violation of law. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.