Security Bank v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis
1896
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1987
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hoyt Post v. Campau · Kimball v. Bryant · Lawton v. St. Paul Permanent Loan Co. · First National Bank v. Security Bank · Morse v. Gilman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is immaterial whether we say that a covenant against an incumbrance which is a money charge on the land runs with the land, or that the cause of action for a breach of the covenant is assignable, and passes by deed to the grantee of the covenantee, immediate or remote, who sustains injury by reason of the incumbrance; for in either case we reach the same result. The covenant, which is one of indemnity, in effect attaches itself to the title assumed to be conveyed by the deed, and accompanies it for the protection of the covenantee or any of his assigns who may finally be injured by the incumbrance. In short, for all practical purposes, a covenant against incumbrances which are a money charge on the land runs with the land until they are discharged.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““He [the subsequent grantee] is the most interested and the most fit person to claim the indemnity secured by them [the covenants], for the compensation belongs to him as the last purchaser and the first sufferer.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pease v. Warner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.