Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 N.J. 347 - In Re Lanza

In Re Lanza’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
4
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 6 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2009 · most notably Matter of Hollendonner (1985), State v. Williams (1987)

3 federal appellate · 6 district · 23 state decisions

901974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “concluding that attorney should have first explained. . . all the facts and indicated in specific detail all of the areas of potential conflict that foreseeably might arise.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A client cannot foresee and cannot be expected to foresee the great variety of potential areas of disagreement that may arise in a real estate transaction of this sort. The attorney is or should be familiar with at least the more common of these and they should be stated and laid before the client at some length and with considerable specificity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in all circumstances it is unethical for the same attorney to represent buyer and seller in negotiating the terms of a contract of sale.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.