Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 N.J. 539 - In Re Blatt

In Re Blatt’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · Signer, Appeal Of · In Re Blatt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is no excuse for an attorney to say that he only did what he did because [he was] directed to do so by his client. The propriety of any proposed course of action must be initially considered by the attorney, and it may be thereafter pursued only if the lawyer is completely satisfied that it involves no ethical compromise. It is for the lawyer, not the client, to make this decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.