Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 Ohio App. 3d 507 - Erb v. Erb

65 Ohio App. 3d 507 - Erb v. Erb’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2024

23 state decisions

8019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Lesher v. Kainrad · 60 Ohio App. 2d 227 - Nolte v. Nolte · 56 Ohio App. 2d 144 - Eisenberg v. Peyton · 11 Ohio App. 3d 91 - Zacek v. Zacek · 9 Ohio App. 3d 222 - Garcia v. Tillack

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The rule contemplates a report which includes a statement of the basis of the referee's findings and recommendations in order that the trial court can make its own independent analysis of the report's validity. If there is no report, the trial court cannot adopt the recommendation as an order of the court since there is a lack of information upon which an independent analysis of questions of law raised by the controversy can be based. "The failure to comply with Civ.R. 53 constitutes grounds upon which the appellate court may reverse the judgment of the trial court. The judgment of the trial court will be set aside upon a showing that the assigned error has merit and that it worked to the prejudice of the appellant." (Internal citations omitted.) Erb v. Erb (1989), 65 Ohio App.3d 507 , 509-10 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.