In re Sekulich’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
98 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Cohen v. Lamko, Inc. (1984), State ex rel. Pizza v. Strope (1990)
98 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · 17 Ohio App. 2d 164 - State v. Whittington · State v. Tate · 37 Ohio App. 2d 7 - In Re Bolden · 121 Ohio St. 544 - Bridgeport Bank Co. v. Shadyside Coal Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is rudimentary that a finding of delinquency by a juvenile court, unaccompanied by any disposition thereof, is not a final appealable order.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(A) Residence in Another County; Transfer Optional. If the child resides in a county of this state and the proceeding is commenced in a court of another county, that court, on its own motion or a motion of a party, may transfer the proceeding to the county of the child's residence upon the filing of the complaint or after the adjudicatory or dispositional hearing for such further proceeding as required. The court of the child's residence shall then proceed as if the original complaint had been filed in that court. Transfer may also be made if the residence of the child changes. (B) Proceedings in Another County; Transfer Required. The proceedings, other than a removal action, shall be so transferred if other proceedings involving the child are pending in the juvenile court of the county of the child's residence. (C) Adjudicatory Hearing in County Where Complaint Filed. Where either the transferring or receiving court finds that the interests of justice and the convenience of the parties so require, the adjudicatory hearing shall be held in the county wherein the complaint was filed. Thereafter the proceeding may be transferred to the county of the child's residence for disposition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re C.W. · In re C.E.“Judgments supported by some competent, *Page 5 credible evidence going to all the essential elements of the case will not be reversed by a reviewing court as being against the manifest weight of the evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.