Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 OHIOST3D 516 - State v. Cook

State v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

797
cited by 797 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 789 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 797 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Conway (2006), State v. Arnett (2000)

2 federal appellate · 789 state decisions

29101992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Barker v. Wingo · State v. Jenks · Wainwright v. Witt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 797 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The prosecution's race-neutral explanation need not rise to the level of a challenge for cause.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “long held that circumstantial evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction if that evidence would convince the average mind of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a strong presumption that counsel's conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance; that is, the defendant must overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action 'might be considered sound trial strategy.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.