Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

65 Okla. 270

153 P 291

Voris v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 23, 1915

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1915-11-23

<p>1. Bills and Notes — Negotiability—Designation of Payee.</p> <p>Where a note is made payable to the party named therein, or in the alternative to bear er, it is a sufficient compliance with sub division 4, see. 4051, Rev. Laws 1910.</p> <p>2. Same — Provision for Attorney’s Fee. Under subdivision 5, sec. 4052, Rev. Laws</p> <p>1910, the sum payable is a sum certain within the meaning of that chapter, although it is to be paid with cost of collection or an attorney’s fee, and a clause in a note, “with $80 attorney’s fees,” does not render the note nonnegotiable within the meaning of that section.</p> <p>3. Bills and Notes — Rights of Holder in Due Course — Alteration.</p> <p>Under section 4174, Rev. Laws 1910, it is provided that where a negotiable instrument is materially altered without the consent of the parties liable thereon, it is void except as against -a party who has himself made, authorized, or assented to the alteration and subsequent indorsers, but when the instrument has been materially altered and is m the hands of a holder in due course not a party to the alteration, he may enforce pay-ment thereof according to its original tenor.</p> <p>(Syllabus by Rittenhouse, 0.)</p>

Reversed and remanded · Decided 1915-11-23

¶1 On Second Petition for Rehearing.

¶2 PER CURIAM. We adhere to the views expressed on the original hearing of this cause in the opinion by Commissioner Rit-tenhouse, except that instead of reversing the cause, with instructions to the trial court to enter judgment as prayed for in the petition, it is ordered that the cause be reversed and remanded for new trial.

All the Justices concur.
/65/okla/270 · .json · Public domain