State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably State v. Ramos (2017), State v. Kinneman (2005)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 105 Wash. 2d 175 - State v. Ammons · State v. Sanwick · State v. Ford · 121 Wash. 2d 707 - State v. Mail · State v. Ford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nlike a standard range sentence, restitution is not entitled to a presumption that there can be no abuse of discretion as a matter of law.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] sentence in a criminal case which is outside the standard range for the offense or which the state or local government believes involves a miscalculation of the standard range.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kinneman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.