Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 P.3d 325 - State v. Cunningham

State v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Berkemer v. McCarty · California v. Beheler · 102 Wash. 2d 733 - State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination requires police to inform a suspect of his or her Miranda rights before a custodial interrogation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “failure to enter findings required by CrR 3.5 is considered harmless error if the court's oral findings are sufficient to permit appellate review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A defendant is in custody for purposes of Miranda when his or her freedom of action is curtailed to a `degree associated with formal arrest.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.