State v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[n]othing in Goodwin ... supports the proposition that the sentencing court must undertake a comparability determination despite the defendant's affirmative agreement with the State's classification.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Ross · State v. Ross

2. “In response, defense counsel expressly conceded that the only other conviction that Hunter was challenging was properly included in his offender score. Defense counsel also acknowledged that the State had properly calculated Hunter's standard range. Hunter, 116 Wash.App. at 302 , 65 P.3d 371 . On appeal, Division One of this court stated that,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Jackson

3. “based on five out-of-state convictions. At sentencing, the State acknowledged that it was unable to prove that one of the five out-of-state convictions was comparable to a Washington felony and that the defendant's offender score was therefore”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Jackson