Getchell v. Lodge’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2021
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Phillips · Ferrell v. Baxter · 154 Ill. 2d 543 - Wakeford v. Rodehouse Restaurants of Missouri, Inc. · National Bank of Alaska v. McHugh · Dobos v. Ingersoll
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“based in part on the rationale that such testimony amounts to an opinion on an ultimate issue that is for the trier of fact to decide ... and in part on the undue weight concerns”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.