Dailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2024
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lambert v. People of the State of California · Whitton v. State · Dorman v. State · Hawley v. State · Speidel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The culpable mental state that applies to this element of the offense is `knowingly.' But . . . the State also had to prove a second culpable mental state: that [the defendant] was aware of the circumstances that triggered his duty to act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Lopez“fair-minded juror exercising reasonable judgment could conclude that the State had met its burden of proving [the defendant's] guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hinson v. State“the person is aware that the conduct is of that nature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.