Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 So. 2d 22 - Henderson v. State

65 So. 2d 22 - Henderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 1963
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 141 (§ 1 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · NLRB v. Fain-Blatt · Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations Board · Hill v. State of Florida Watson · Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The Federal Act has pre-empted the field and under that act, labor unions have the right within the limits prescribed thereby of peaceful strikes for higher wages, or for better working conditions. Where state legislation denies a right guaranteed by Congress, such state legislation is in conflict with Federal law. * * * "The question of the agreement of this Court with the majority opinion in the Wisconsin case [Amalgamated Ass'n of Street R. etc., v. Wisconsin Employment Rel. Bd., 340 U.S. 383 , 71 S.Ct. 359 , 95 L.Ed. 364 ] is not involved in this opinion. Article 6 of the Constitution of the United States, among other things, provides as follows: "`This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; * * * shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.' "When a law, enacted by Congress, is construed and interpreted by the Supreme Court of the United States, that interpretation and construction becomes a part of the supreme law of the land, and an opinion by that tribunal upon the questions at issue is absolutely binding upon this Court, whatever may be the personal predilections of the Justices. * * * So it is, that until the law is modified or changed by Congress, or the opinion with reference thereto is modified, changed or receded from by the Supreme Court of the United States, this Court and every o”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.