Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

65 So. 2d 310

Sparkman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 8, 1953

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1953-05-08

Decided 1953-05-08

DREW, Justice

¶1(dissenting).

¶2The first information charged no offense. It was not defective because of any *311defect, omission or insufficiency in the contents or form. Therefore, it was not subject to amendment under 932.05, F.S.A. Provision for amendments is based upon the premise that what is amended' must charge an offense.

/65/so2d/310 · .json · Public domain