Petersen v. Mayo’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1963
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Locklin v. Pridgeon · Ex Parte: Charles Franklin Stirrup · Atkinson v. Powledge · Ritter v. Sinclair · Blackburn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defects in an information are not subject to attack in a habeas corpus proceeding unless the defects are of such magnitude that the information utterly fails to charge any crime or offense under the laws of the State of Florida.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.