Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 SO2D 769 - Feigen v. Sokolsky

Feigen v. Sokolsky’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
August 1999
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1999

8 state decisions

4019531960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McGregor v. Provident Trust Co. · Matson v. Tip Top Grocery Company, Inc. · 61 So. 2d 477 - Earley v. Morrison Cafeteria Co. of Orlando · Bowles v. Elkes Pontiac Co. · Dempsey-Vanderbilt Hotel, Inc. v. Huisman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The facts or evidence upon which the first opinion in this case was predicated are not the same on this appeal. There can be no `law of the case' which is controlling when the facts are different at the two trials, as they are in this case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.