Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 SO2D 801 - Thompson v. Suprena

Thompson v. Suprena’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 1993
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1993

7 state decisions

3019531960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Paul v. Nolen · 28 So. 2d 287 - Terrenova v. Feldner · McFlynn v. Crescent Realty Corp. of Delaware · 13 So. 2d 506 - Mitchal v. Armstrong · Atkinson v. Stern

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The owner of premises leased under a contract whereby the lessee assumes responsibility for their condition is not liable for injury caused by any defect therein to the lessee or anyone on the premises who derives his right to be thereon from the lessee, unless the owner knew or should have known of the defect or had received notice thereof and failed to remedy it within a reasonable time." (Italics ours.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““While the provisions of the lease require such written notice, nothing appears to that effect in the act (Sec. 1 of Act 174 of 1932, LSA-R.S. 9:3221), and as we said in Mitchal v. Armstrong, La.App., 13 So.2d 506 , 507: “ ‘ * * * it is quite sufficient that the landlord have notice of the vice or defect or, under the prevailing circumstances, “should within reason have known thereof” and “failed to remedy same within a reasonable time thereafter”.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Art. 670. Every one is bound to keep his buildings in repair, so that neither their fall, nor that of any part of the materials composing them, may injure the neighbors or passengers,* under the penalty of all losses and damages, which may result from the neglect of the owner in that respect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.