65 So. 3d 553 - Freeman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Pennsylvania v. Finley · 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District · 731 So. 2d 638 - Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he exercise of that discretion must be informed by the facts and circumstances of the individual case . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An uninformed exercise of discretion is, by definition, arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“within the rubric of Faretta[ v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975)].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.