Alexander v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 676 So. 2d 1322 - Ex Parte Bryowsky · 646 So. 2d 46 - Ex Parte Perkins · 810 So. 2d 631 - Ex Parte Fann · Phillips v. Phillips · Golden v. Golden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). II. Appeal No. 2160860 The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in ordering the husband or his attorneys to pay all or a portion of the fees of the wife's expert witness. In pertinent part, Rule 26(b)(5), Ala. R. Civ. P., provides:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rohling v. Rohling“[T]he decision whether to require a payor spouse to obtain life insurance to benefit the recipient spouse is absolutely discretionary with the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rohling v. Rohling
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.