Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 SW3D 632 - Robinson v. Clement

Robinson v. Clement’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sandin v. Conner · Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc. · Boyce v. Williams · Watts v. Civil Service Board for Columbia · Powell v. Parole Eligibility Review Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is based on a misapplication of controlling legal principles or a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence, Overstreet v. Shoney’s, Inc., 4 S.W.3d 694, 709 (Tenn.Ct.App.1999), or unless it affirmatively appears that the trial court’s decision was against logic or reasoning, and caused an injustice or injury to the complaining party. Marcus v. Marcus, 993 S.W.2d 596, 601 (Tenn.1999); Doug las v. Estate of Robertson, 876 S.W.2d 95, 97 (Tenn.1994).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.