Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 SW3D 73 - Jaubert v. State

Jaubert v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Roe, Warden v. Flores-Ortega · Montgomery v. State · Johnson v. State · Boykin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]vidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.