Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 TC 548 - Sylvan v. Commissioner

Sylvan v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Miller v. United States (1986), Estate of Wood Jm v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

200197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Helvering v. Hallock · C. Louis Wood and Hallie D. Wood v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Wood v. Commissioner · Paulino v. Hamburg-Amerika West German Line, Inc · Moffat v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) General rule. (1) Date of delivery. If any return, claim, statement, or other document required to be filed, or any payment required to be made, within a prescribed period or on or before a prescribed date under authority of any provision of the internal revenue laws is, after such period or such date, delivered by United States mail to the agency, officer, or office with which such return, claim, statement, or other document is required to be filed, or to which such payment is required to be made, the date of the United States postmark stamped on the cover in which such return, claim, statement, or other document, or payment, is mailed shall be deemed to be the date of delivery or the date of payment, as the case may be.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Within 90 days, or 150 days if the notice is addressed to a person outside the States of the Union and the District of Columbia, after the notice of deficiency authorized in section 6212 is mailed (not counting Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday in the District of Columbia as the last day), the taxpayer may file a petition with the Tax Court for a redetermination of the deficiency. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.