¶1delivered the opinion of the court.
¶2The defendant was araigned in the Circuit Court of Carrol county upon an indictment for an assault and battery. He pleaded not guilty. His plea was entered of record, and at his instance the cause continued until the next term, at which time he filed a plea in abatement, which avers that one of the grand jury who found the indictment was incompetent, having been convicted of an infamous crime.
¶3*512Without any notice being taken of this plea by the Attorney General, the court made an order “ allowing the plea,” and discharging the defendant. The Attorney General appealed in behalf of the State.
¶4The judgment is erroneous for several reasons:
¶51st. The Attorney General should have had an opportunity to deny the sufficiency of the plea by demurrer or motion, or to traverse the facts of the plea. This does not appear to have been waived.
¶62d. It was improper to consider the plea in abatement filed after the plea of not guilty, and a continuance of the cause without special leave to do so.. The plea should have been stricken out upon motion or disregarded. The authorities are uniform.
¶73d. The plea itself was insufficient. It does not aver, directly or indirectly, that twelve competent jurors did not concur in finding the indictment: 4 Hum., 12, 13, and other authorities.
¶8Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded to be tried upon the plea of not guilty.