65 Tex. Crim. 564 - Yantis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1972
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . The indictment must have been found upon the testimony of some, if not all, of these witnesses; and, if so, the grand jury could have found out the name of the owner by simply asking it. Under such circumstances, they should have sought and obtained the information.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Payne v. Stated““ * * * When the name of the person is unknown to. the grand jury, that fact shall be stated * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ansley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.