¶1 I concur. I am of the opinion, however, that in view of the court’s finding that the defendant was guilty of extreme cruelty toward the plaintiff, and thus made it impossible for her to continue her relationship as a wife, and compelled her to appeal to a court of justice to sever her relationship with the defendant, that the district court clearly abused the discretion vested in it with respect to the al- *609 lowanee or disallowance of alimony in this case. I am also of the opinion that in view of the findings, which have now become irrevocable, all that the district court is now empowered to do is to determine the amount that should be awarded to the plaintiff out of the property owned by the defendant.
65 Utah 605
238 P 647
Friedli v. Friedli
Decided July 15, 1925
Utah Supreme Court · decided 1925-07-15
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1925-07-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1951
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →