Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 Wash. 2d 372 - State v. Smith

65 Wash. 2d 372 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 1998
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1998

9 state decisions

301964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kincaid · State v. Hurlbert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he situs of a crime is not an element of that crime but is a matter of venue. The State may prove venue by circumstantial evidence. It is sufficient if it appears at trial indirectly that the venue is properly laid.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.