65 Wash. App. 541 - State v. Richmond’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · New York v. Quarles · Hagemann v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n · Marathon Oil Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“suspect’s freedom of action is curtailed to a . 'degree associated with formal arrest.’ ” ’ ” State v. Short, 113 Wn.2d 35, 40 , 775 P.2d 458 (1989) (quoting State v. Harris, 106 Wn.2d 784, 789 , 725 P.2d 975 (1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 940 (1987)). That determination depends on whether the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`suspect reasonably supposed his freedom of action was curtailed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Posenjak
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.