65 Wash. App. 692 - Trimen Development Co. v. King County’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Indelicato v. United States · 112 Wash. 2d 193 - LaMon v. Butler · 101 Wash. 2d 68 - South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King County · 97 Wash. 2d 804 - Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish County · 83 Wash. 2d 714 - Deschenes v. King County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The payment shall be held in a reserve account and may only be expended to fund a capital improvement agreed upon by the parties to mitigate the identified, direct impact; (2) The payment shall be expended in all cases within five years of collection; and (3) Any payment not so expended shall be refunded with interest at the rate applied to judgments to the property owners of record at the time of the refund No county, city, town, or other municipal corporation shall require any payment as part of such a voluntary agreement which the county, city, town, or other municipal corporation cannot establish is reasonably necessary as a direct result of the proposed development or plat.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Every Subdivision final approval . . . shall be contingent upon reservation or dedication of land for the open space and recreational needs of its residents or payment of a fee-in-lieu thereof. The developer may either reserve or dedicate land, or make payment of a fee-in-lieu thereof pursuant to this chapter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We cannot countenance allowing a developer to reap the advantages of final plat approval obtained without challenge to the approval conditions, and only bring a challenge to those conditions after the municipality has lost any ability to negotiate a solution to the problem other than refund of the fee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.