65 Wash. App. 887 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2010
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 54 Wash. App. 585 - State v. Perencevic · 59 Wash. App. 848 - State v. Becker · 57 Wash. App. 512 - State v. Blair · 52 Wash. App. 796 - State v. Chavez · 56 Wash. App. 853 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Caley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Class C prior felony convictions . . . shall not be included in the offender score if, since the last date of release from confinement. . . pursuant to a felony conviction,. . . the offender had spent five consecutive years in the community without being convicted of any felonies.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Smith’s concern that a misdemeanor sentence or time spent pretrial on a charge for which the defendant was eventually acquitted would interrupt the washout period is not well taken. Under the clear language of the statute the washout period is interrupted not for any reason, but only for time spent in confinement pursuant to a felony conviction.[ 2 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“since the last date of release from confinement (including full-time residential treatment) pursuant to a felony conviction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ervin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.