65 Wis. 2d 207 - State v. Goulette’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
75 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably 174 Ill. 2d 268 - Hanrahan v. Williams (1996), 84 Wis. 2d 57 - Van Ermen v. Department of Health & Social Services (1978)
75 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · 50 Wis. 2d 540 - State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Cady · 7 Cal. 3d 639 - In Re Minnis · Monks v. New Jersey State Parole Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is limited to determining: (1) Whether the board kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether it acted according to law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination in question.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage“some form of comprehensible and adequate record should be kept and provided for purposes of review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““We do not deem it advisable for further comment upon the manner of conducting the hearing nor the adequacy of the standards which apply because we are informed that the department is now in the process of formulating, in written form, the procedures and standards to be used by the Parole Board in parole hearings. Our review of the necessary procedures and standards should await the department’s determination of these questions, provided, of course that they are forthcoming and effective within a reasonably short period of time.” 65 Wis. 2d at page 216 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.