Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 Wis. 2d 331 - Bailey v. State

65 Wis. 2d 331 - Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
1
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr (1983), 81 Wis. 2d 376 - State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social Services (1978)

72 state decisions

260197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 34 Wis. 2d 278 - Whitty v. State · 31 Wis. 2d 110 - Lock v. State · 53 Wis. 2d 218 - Bautista v. State · State v. Brodson · Mar Win Development Company v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] preliminary examination is a hearing before a court for the purpose of determining if there is probable cause to believe a felony has been committed by the defendant.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to protect the accused from hasty, improvident, or malicious prosecution and to discover whether there is a substantial basis for bringing the prosecution and further denying the accused his right to liberty.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “so long as they are not wholly unrelated to the transactions or facts considered or testified to at the preliminary.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.