Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 65 Wis. 2d 703 - Ziegler v. State

65 Wis. 2d 703 - Ziegler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
November 1995
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1995

7 state decisions

40197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Flick-Reedy Corp. v. Hydro-Line Manufacturing Co. · 53 Wis. 2d 218 - Bautista v. State · 65 Wis. 2d 596 - McAdoo v. State · 42 Wis. 2d 170 - Boller v. Cofrances · 51 Wis. 2d 641 - Kelley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . I see no reason why you jurors aren’t just as competent and just as able or as likely to decide this case and decide it right as the next jury that would be called upon to determine the case. I don’t want you to understand, by what I say, that you are going to be made to agree or that you are going to be kept out until you do agree. I do want you to understand that it is your duty to make an honest and sincere attempt to arrive at a verdict. Jurors should not be obstinate. They should be open-minded. They should listen to the arguments of others and talk matters over freely and fairly and make an honest effort as fair-minded men and women to come to a conclusion on all of the issues presented to them. Now I’m going to ask you to retire to the jury room again and resume your deliberations. . ." 1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.