Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 650 A.2d 1334 - Danforth v. Ruotolo

Danforth v. Ruotolo’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2017

2 district · 9 state decisions

50199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aladdin Electric Associates v. Town of Old Orchard Beach · A.F.A.B., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard Beach · Ames v. Dipietro-Kay Corp. · Cole v. Clark · Colvin v. Barrett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The elements of unjust enrichment are (1) a benefit conferred on defendant by plaintiff; (2) an appreciation or knowledge by the defendant of the benefit; and (3) the acceptance or retention of the benefit in circumstances that make it inequitable for the defendant to retain the benefit without payment for the value of the benefit conferred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.