Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

650 F.2d 1324

Docket No. 78-3064.

Byrd v. Reederei

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1981.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1981-06-24

2 counsel of record

Relies on Byrd v. Reederei · State Fair of Texas v. United States Consumer Product Safety Commission

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1981-06-24

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2001

4 federal appellate ·

120198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Joel D. Eaton, Walter H. Beckham, Jr., Miami, Fla., Roger Vaughan, Wagner, Cunning, Vaughan & Genders, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee.

¶2Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs,-Villareal & Banker, Nathaniel G. W. Pieper, Dewey R. Villareal, Jr., Tampa, Fla., for defendantappellee, cross-appellant.

¶3ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶4(5 Cir., 1981, 638 F.2d 1300).

¶5Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, and BROWN, AINSWORTH, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCH-ETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

¶6BY THE COURT:

¶7A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, 638 F.2d 1300, 5 Cir.

¶8IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/650/f2d/1324 · .json · Public domain