Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 650 F.2d 147 - Johnson v. Boyd-Richardson Co.

Johnson v. Boyd-Richardson Co.’s Empirical Analysis

650 F.2d 147 · 1981

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
4
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Wright v. Collins (1985), United States v. Schronce (1984)

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

18019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on Costello v. United States · Hughes v. United States · Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp. · Boazman v. Economics Laboratory, Inc. · Holt v. Pitts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a dismissal is for 'lack of jurisdiction,' the effect is not an adjudication on the merits, and therefore the res judicata bar does not arise.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In a civilized system of justice, the norm should be to decide claims on their merits, and the mere inaction of a party or his lawyer should not result in the loss of a hypothetically meritorious claim, except in those limited instances, see e.g., Fed.RXiv.P. 37, where clear notice is given in advance that a certain procedural default will or might result in loss of a claim or defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “encompassing those dismissals which are based on a plaintiff's failure to comply with a precondition requisite to the Court's going forward to determine the merits of his substantive claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.