← 650 F.2d 595 - United States v. Burroughs

United States v. Burroughs’s Empirical Analysis

650 F.2d 595 · 1981

Citation profile

cited by 65 later decisions

states following

September 2016

most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably United States v. Phillips (1981), Washington v. Watkins (1981)

28 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Page v. Work · MacKenna v. Ellis · MacKenna v. Ellis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[A]llegations . . . not expressly argued on . . . appeal . . . are deemed by us to be abandoned.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Jones v. State · Nicks v. State
“`not [to] errorless counsel, and not [to] counsel judged ineffective by hindsight, but [to] counsel reasonably likely to render and rendering reasonably effective assistance.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 756 So. 2d 971 - Lawhorn v. State · Ross v. Wj Estelle
“"In circumstances such as this, when the petitioner's allegations are affirmatively contradicted by the record, an evidentiary hearing is not required. United States v. Guerra , 588 F.2d 519 , 520 (5th Cir. 1979); Holland v. United States , 406 F.2d 213 , 216 (5th Cir. 1969). As a result, notice and an opportunity to respond need not be given to the United States Attorney. Rush v. United States , 559 F.2d 455 , 459 (7th Cir. 1977); Tremarco v. United States , 412 F. Supp. 550 , 551 (D.N.J. 1976)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Bishop v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.