Alli v. Decker’s Empirical Analysis
650 F.3d 1007 · 2011
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1341 · 28 U.S.C. § 2202 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Russello v. United States · Steffel v. Thompson · United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is apparent that the jurisdictional limitations in § 1252(f)(1) do not encompass declaratory relief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The only occasions where this Court has . . . found that a preclusion of injunctive relief inevitably led to a denial of declaratory relief have been cases in which principles of federalism militated altogether against federal intervention in a class of adjudications.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“declaratory relief will not always be the functional equivalent of injunctive relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hamama v. Adducci
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.